Optimal Prone Position Duration in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19: The Omelette Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prone position (PP) has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic for ARDS management. However, the optimal length of a PP session is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prolonged versus standard PP duration in subjects with ARDS due to COVID-19. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized controlled, parallel, and open pilot trial including adult subjects diagnosed with severe ARDS due to COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation that met criteria for PP between March-September 2021. Subjects were randomized to the intervention group of prolonged PP (48 h) versus the standard of care PP (∼16 h). The primary outcome variable for the trial was ventilator-free days (VFDs) to day 28. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 subjects. VFDs were not significantly different in the standard PP group (18 [interquartile range [IQR] 0-23] VFDs vs 7.5 [IQR 0-19.0] VFDs; difference, -10.5 (95% CI -3.5 to 19.0, P = .08). Prolonged PP was associated with longer time to successful extubation in survivors (13.00 [IQR 8.75-26.00] d vs 8.00 [IQR 5.00-10.25] d; difference, 5 [95% CI 0-15], P = .001). Prolonged PP was also significantly associated with longer ICU stay (18.5 [IQR 11.8-25.3] d vs 11.50 [IQR 7.75-25.00] d, P = .050) and extended administration of neuromuscular blockers (12.50 [IQR 5.75-20.00] d vs 5.0 [IQR 2.0-14.5] d, P = .005). Prolonged PP was associated with significant muscular impairment according to lower Medical Research Council values (59.6 [IQR 59.1-60.0] vs 56.5 [IQR 54.1-58.9], P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with severe ARDS due to COVID-19, there was no difference in 28-d VFDs between prolonged and standard PP strategy. However, prolonged PP was associated with a longer ICU stay, increased use of neuromuscular blockers, and greater muscular impairment. This suggests that prolonged PP is not superior to the current recommended standard of care.

Postoperative Blood Pressure Deficit and Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury is a common cause of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In critically ill patients who received an orthotopic liver transplant, we examined whether those with acute kidney injury had a greater deficit between pretransplant and posttransplant hemodynamic pressure-related parameters compared with those without acute kidney injury in the early postoperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients who underwent an orthotopic liver transplant during the study period. We obtained premorbid and intensive care unit time-weighted average values for hemodynamic pressure-related parameters (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure; central venous pressure; mean perfusion pressure; and diastolic perfusion pressure) and calculated deficits in those values. We defined acute kidney injury progression as an increase of ≥1 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage. RESULTS: We included 150 eligible transplantrecipients, with 88 (59%) having acute kidney injury progression. Acute kidney injury was associated with worse clinical outcomes. All achieved pressure-related values were similar between transplant recipients with or without acute kidney injury progression. However, those with acute kidney injury versus those without progression had greater diastolic perfusion pressure deficit at 12 hours (-8.33% vs 1.93%; P = .037) and 24 hours (-7.38% vs 5.11%; P = .002) and increased central venous pressure at 24 hours (46.13% vs 15%; P = .043) and 48 hours (40% vs 20.87%; P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute kidney injury progression had a greater diastolic perfusion pressure deficit and increased central venous pressure compared with patients without progression. Such deficits might be modifiable risk factors for the prevention of acute kidney injury progression.

Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Refractory Myoclonic Status. A Case Report.

A case of myoclonic status treated with plasmapheresis in a patient of 63 years of age who was admitted to a Spanish intensive care unit is reported. The patient showed clinical and radiological evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; molecular tests did not verify this.

Combination of arterial lactate levels and Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio to predict early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: We examined the ability of the P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio combined with elevated lactate levels to predict early allograft dysfunction (EAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were classified into four groups according to lactate levels and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio: Group 1; lactate >2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio >1.0; Group 2; lactate >2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio <1.0; group 3; lactate<2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio >1.0; group 4; lactate<2.0 mmol/L and P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio <1.0. We defined EAD according to Olthoff criteria. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty patients were included. EAD occurred in 41 patients (27.3%), and was associated with worse graft survival at 1 year (92% vs. 73%; P = ,003) as well as a higher re-transplantation rate (4,6% vs. 17,1%; P = ,019). The multivariate analysis revealed that P(v-a)CO2/Da-vO2 ratio at T6 [OR 7.05(CI95% 2.77-19.01, P<.001)] was an independent predictor for EAD. Belonging to group 1 at 6 h was associated with worse clinical outcomes but no association was found with 1-year graft survival or 1-year patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this single center, prospective, observational study in patients who received an OLT, we found that elevated lactate levels combined with a high Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 after 6 h was associated with the development of EAD and worse clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period.

Aplicación de la nueva definición Sepsis-3 en una cohorte de pacientes con sepsis grave y shock séptico ingresados en unidad de cuidados intensivos desde el Servicio de Urgencias / Application of the new Sepsis-3 definition in a cohort of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department

Antecedentes y objetivo: Tras la publicación de la nueva definición de sepsis y shock séptico, nuestro objetivo es analizar la evolución de los pacientes que ingresan en UCI por enfermedad infecciosa utilizando la definición clásica y los nuevos criterios. Material y métodos: Subanálisis de un estudio observacional y prospectivo. Incluye a 98 pacientes ingresados en UCI por enfermedad infecciosa desde Urgencias durante 18 meses. Se estudió la evolución clínica en UCI y la mortalidad hospitalaria. Resultados: El 78% de los pacientes tuvieron shock séptico con la definición Sepsis-2 y el 52% con los criterios Sepsis-3. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 29 y del 41%, respectivamente. El RR de mortalidad hospitalaria de los pacientes con shock séptico fue 10,3 (IC 95%: 2,8-37,5) respecto a los pacientes sin shock. La probabilidad de supervivencia a los 30 días de los pacientes con sepsis y shock séptico fue del 78 y 68%, respectivamente (long Rank < 0,001). Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la incorporación de la puntuación SOFA y el lactato a la nueva definición puede mejorar la valoración del riesgo de muerte hospitalaria

Background and objectives: After the publication of the new definition for sepsis and septic shock, our objective is to analyse the evolution of patients admitted to ICU with an infection process using the previous and new recommendations. Materials and methods: This is a sub-analysis of a previous observational prospective study. We included 98 patients admitted to ICU from the emergency department due to infection during an 18-month period. We studied the clinical evolution during ICU admission and hospital mortality. Results: According to Sepsis-2 definition, 78% percent had septic shock and using Sepsis-3 criteria, 52%; hospital mortality was 29 and 41%, respectively. The RR of hospital mortality of septic shock was 10.3 (95% CI: 2.8-37.5) compared to patients without shock. The 30-day probability survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock were 78% and 68%, respectively (long rank < 0.001). Conclusions: In our experience, the incorporation of the SOFA score and lactate levels to the new definition could help improve the evaluation of risk of hospital death

Application of the new Sepsis-3 definition in a cohort of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department. / Aplicación de la nueva definición Sepsis-3 en una cohorte de pacientes con sepsis grave y shock séptico ingresados en unidad de cuidados intensivos desde el Servicio de Urgencias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: After the publication of the new definition for sepsis and septic shock, our objective is to analyse the evolution of patients admitted to ICU with an infection process using the previous and new recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a previous observational prospective study. We included 98 patients admitted to ICU from the emergency department due to infection during an 18-month period. We studied the clinical evolution during ICU admission and hospital mortality. RESULTS: According to Sepsis-2 definition, 78% percent had septic shock and using Sepsis-3 criteria, 52%; hospital mortality was 29 and 41%, respectively. The RR of hospital mortality of septic shock was 10.3 (95% CI: 2.8-37.5) compared to patients without shock. The 30-day probability survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock were 78% and 68%, respectively (long rank < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the incorporation of the SOFA score and lactate levels to the new definition could help improve the evaluation of risk of hospital death.